Ultrasound Research - Screening, Diagnosis, Pregnancy, Detection

Ultrasound Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Ultrasound, including details on screening, diagnosis, pregnancy, detection.


Ultrasound Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Ultrasound

Books on Ultrasound

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Significance of the early postoperative duplex result in infrainguinal vein bypass surveillance.

Mofidi R, Kelman J, Berry O, Bennett S, Murie JA, Dawson AR

Department of Vascular Surgery, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK. rmofidi@doctors.net.uk

BACKGROUND: Duplex surveillance of infrainguinal vein grafts may not be efficient. METHODS: Consecutive patients who had received infrainguinal vein grafts were enrolled in a duplex surveillance program. A first scan at 6 weeks after surgery categorized grafts into four groups: (a) low risk grafts, (b) mild flow disturbance, (c) intermediate stenosis and (d) critical stenosis. Disease progression was assessed over time. RESULTS: Of 364 grafts followed-up for a median of 23 months, 236 (65%) had no flow abnormality at 6-weeks, and had a 40-month cumulative patency rate of 82%. The remaining 128 (35%) grafts had a flow disturbance. Of 29 critical stenoses, 15 were repaired, 11 occluded and three did not change. Of 57 intermediate lesions, 32 progressed to critical, nine occluded, two were repaired and 14 did not change or improved. Of 42 mild lesions, 16 progressed to a higher grade, four occluded and 22 did not change or improved. There was no significant difference in graft patency between grafts with repaired stenoses and those without stenoses, but grafts with untreated critical stenoses were associated with lower patency (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A duplex scan 6 weeks after operation can predict those patients who require continuing duplex surveillance.

Published 10 August 2007 in Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 34(3): 327-32.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Ultrasound Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Ultrasound Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)



Ultrasound Books

Ultrasound Physics CD-ROM Mock Exam

Ultrasound Physics CD-ROM Mock Exam