Ultrasound Research - Screening, Diagnosis, Pregnancy, Detection

Ultrasound Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Ultrasound, including details on screening, diagnosis, pregnancy, detection.


Ultrasound Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Ultrasound

Books on Ultrasound

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Assessment of left atrial ejection force in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography.

Anwar AM, Soliman OI, Geleijnse ML, Michels M, Vletter WB, Nemes A, ten Cate FJ

Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

The study included 30 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (obstructive and nonobstructive) and 15 control subjects. End-diastolic mitral annulus area (MAA(3D)) and mitral valve area (MVA(3D)) were measured by real-time 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography. MVA(2D) and peak mitral inflow A wave velocity (V) were measured by 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. Left atrial ejection force (LA-EF) was calculated by 2D echocardiography and real-time 3D echocardiography using the formula: 0.5 x 1.06 x (MAA or MVA) x V2, where (1.06) is blood viscosity. LA-EF(2D-MVA), LA-EF(3D-MVA), LA-EF(3D-MAA), and V were significantly higher in patients with HCM than control subjects (P < .001). LA-EF(2D-MVA) and LA-EF(3D-MVA) were lower than LA-EF(3D-MAA) in HCM only (P < .001). In obstructive HCM, LA-EF(2D-MVA), LA-EF(3D-MVA), LA-EF(3D-MAA), and V were significantly higher than in nonobstructive HCM (P < .05). Left ventricular outflow tract gradient contributed independently to high LA-EF in obstructive HCM. We concluded that HCM is associated with higher LA-EF than normal, and higher in obstructive HCM than nonobstructive indicating a higher atrial workload that is reflected by LA-EF(3D-MAA).

Published 4 June 2007 in J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 20(6): 744-8.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Ultrasound Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Ultrasound Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)



Ultrasound Books

Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation, 4th Edition

Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation, 4th Edition