Ultrasound Research - Screening, Diagnosis, Pregnancy, Detection

Ultrasound Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Ultrasound, including details on screening, diagnosis, pregnancy, detection.


Ultrasound Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Ultrasound

Books on Ultrasound

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Reliability analysis on ductus venosus assessment at 11-14 weeks' gestation in a high-risk population.

Borrell A, Perez M, Figueras F, Meler E, Gonce A, Gratacos E

Institute of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic, Maternitat Campus, University of Barcelona Medical School, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. aborrell@medicina.ub.es

OBJECTIVE: To assess the intra- and interobserver reliability of the fetal ductus venosus (DV) blood flow measurements at 11-14 weeks' gestation in a high-risk population for chromosomal defects. METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive singleton pregnancies at high risk for chromosomal or genetic anomalies were included. DV end-diastolic velocity (EDV) and the pulsatility index for veins (PIV) were determined by manual tracing in three sets of waveforms by a single sonographist to assess intraobserver reliability using transvaginal ultrasound. Subsequently, the EDV and the PIV were also determined in a further set by a second sonographist to assess interobserver reliability. Reliability was evaluated by means of the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The degree of agreement was also examined using the limits of agreement method. RESULTS: The intraobserver reliability was 0.81 (95% C.I. 0.69-0.89) for EDV and 0.91 (95% C.I. 0.85-0.95) for the PIV, both corresponding to almost perfect reliability. The interobserver reliability was 0.50 (95% C.I. 0.20-0.70) for EDV, and 0.74 (95% C.I. 0.54-0.86) for PIV, corresponding respectively to moderate and substantial reliabilities. The 95% interval of the EDV differences (cm/s) within and between observers were (+6.1, - 4.6) and (+13.6, - 9.7), respectively. The 95% interval of the PIV differences within and between observers were (+0.32, - 0.36) and (+0.7, - 0.67), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver reliability for EDV is only moderate, whereas for the PIV is substantial, allowing its use for clinical purposes in a high-risk population.

Published 7 May 2007 in Prenat Diagn, 27(5): 442-6.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Ultrasound Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Ultrasound Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)



Ultrasound Books

Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation, 4th Edition

Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation, 4th Edition