Ultrasound Research - Screening, Diagnosis, Pregnancy, Detection

Ultrasound Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Ultrasound, including details on screening, diagnosis, pregnancy, detection.


Ultrasound Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Ultrasound

Books on Ultrasound

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Relation of ultrasound morphologic characteristics of central pulmonary artery thromboemboli to their ex vivo lysibility.

Podbregar M, Gabrscek L, Pakiz M, Blinc A, Sabović M, Kralj E

Clinical Department for Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia. matej.podbregar@guest.arnes.si

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound morphology of massive central pulmonary artery thromboemboli (TE) is an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. The aim of this study was to asses ex vivo lysibility of morphologically different TE. METHODS: Forty-five central pulmonary artery TE, collected at autopsies, were divided into hypoechoic (group A) and hyperechoic (group B) categories. TE were lysed with alteplase in a perfusing system simulating pulmonary circulation for 1 hour. RESULTS: The grey scale mean of thrombi in group B was higher compared with group A (64 +/- 7 vs. 38 +/- 7, respectively, P < .01). Spontaneous lysis in group A did not differ compared with group B (2.2% +/- 0.5% vs. 2.1% +/- 0.4%, P = .4). After incubation with alteplase, the weight of TE was reduced more in group A than in group B (16% +/- 2% vs. 11% +/- 2%, P < .001). The grey scale mean negatively correlated with the percentage of TE weight reduction (0.768) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound morphology of TE from central pulmonary arteries correlates significantly with ex vivo lysibility. Hypoechoic TE are more susceptible to thrombolysis than hyperechoic TE.

Published 5 March 2007 in J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 20(3): 276-80.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Ultrasound Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Ultrasound Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)



Ultrasound Books

Practical Ultrasound: An Illustrated Guide

Practical Ultrasound: An Illustrated Guide