Ultrasound Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Ultrasound, including details on screening, diagnosis, pregnancy, detection.

Usefulness of isovolumic and systolic ejection signals by tissue Doppler for the assessment of left ventricular systolic function in ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Ruan Q, Nagueh SF

First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Echocardiography is the imaging modality most frequently used to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (EF). However, the accuracy of the EF can be limited by the technical quality of the examination and observer variability. Recently, tissue Doppler was applied to acquire signals of myocardial systolic function, including systolic ejection velocity (S(a)) and the systolic isovolumic acceleration rate (IVA). In that regard, IVA was reported in animal studies to be the ideal noninvasive index, because it was not affected by preload and afterload and provided a reliable assessment of contractility when examined against invasive gold standards. However, a paucity of data is available about its clinical application. We undertook this investigation to examine S(a) and IVA in 40 normal subjects and 52 patients with depressed EF referred for echocardiographic examination, aiming to identify the signal with the highest reproducibility and the most accurate detection of depressed EF. S(a) had the least inter- and intraobserver variabilities (3 +/- 1.5% and 2.5 +/- 1%, respectively), and IVA had the highest variability (8.1 +/- 2.1% and 6.8 +/- 2%, respectively). Although S(a) and IVA were significantly lower in patients with depressed EF (p <0.05), S(a) had the best correlation with EF (r = 0.65, p <0.03) and S(a) of <7 cm/s was the most accurate (p <0.05 vs IVA) in identifying patients with EF <45% (sensitivity 93%, specificity 87%). In conclusion, S(a) velocity is the most suitable signal for clinical application as a surrogate for left ventricular EF, given its accuracy and reproducibility.

Published 6 March 2006 in Am J Cardiol, 97(6): 872-5.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

© 2004-2008 Ultrasound Research Today. All Rights Reserved.