Ultrasound Research - Screening, Diagnosis, Pregnancy, Detection

Ultrasound Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Ultrasound, including details on screening, diagnosis, pregnancy, detection.


Ultrasound Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Ultrasound

Books on Ultrasound

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



The effect of sevoflurane on cerebral autoregulation in young children as assessed by the transient hyperemic response.

Wong GT, Luginbuehl I, Karsli C, Bissonnette B

Department of Anesthesia, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. gordontcwong@hotmail.com

The transient hyperemic response (THR) test is a simple, noninvasive technique to evaluate cerebral autoregulation using transcranial Doppler. It has not yet been used in studies involving children. In this study we evaluated this response in children undergoing general anesthesia using sevoflurane. Twenty ASA physical status I children undergoing elective urological surgery sequentially received sevoflurane at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 MAC in a randomized order. Analgesia was solely provided by caudal anesthesia. The right middle cerebral artery flow velocities before (F1), during (F2), and after (F3) a 10-s ipsilateral carotid artery compression were recorded. The THR ratios (THRR) (+/- sd) for 0.5 MAC, 1.0 MAC, and 1.5 MAC were 1.24 +/- 0.11, 1.16 +/- 0.09, and 1.13 +/- 0.07, respectively. The THRR was significantly different between 0.5 MAC versus 1.0 and 1.5 MAC, respectively (P < 0.05). However, no difference was detected between 1.0 and 1.5 MAC. A THRR of more than 1.09 has previously been accepted as the lower limit of a positive response. The results in this study suggest that THR is affected by sevoflurane in a dose-dependent fashion but is maintained at up to 1.5 MAC. This suggests cerebral autoregulation is preserved in children anesthetized with up to 1.5 MAC sevoflurane.

Published 22 March 2006 in Anesth Analg, 102(4): 1051-5.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Ultrasound Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Ultrasound Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)



Ultrasound Books

Radiographic Imaging and Exposure (Fauber, Radiographic Imaging & Exposure)

Radiographic Imaging and Exposure (Fauber, Radiographic Imaging & Exposure)