Ultrasound Research - Screening, Diagnosis, Pregnancy, Detection

Ultrasound Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Ultrasound, including details on screening, diagnosis, pregnancy, detection.


Ultrasound Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Ultrasound

Books on Ultrasound

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



The systolic to diastolic duration ratio in children with heart failure secondary to restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Friedberg MK, Silverman NH

Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Lucille Packard Children's Hospital and Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

Systole (S) and diastole (D) are fundamental to cardiac function, yet their durations are not routinely evaluated. We defined the S/D duration ratio in 11 children with restrictive cardiomyopathy (CM) and 31 control subjects, using tricuspid regurgitant flow duration. We correlated S/D ratio, S duration, and D duration with heart rate and compared groups. Heart rates of control subjects and patients with restrictive CM were similar (P = .995). The S/D ratio was higher in patients with restrictive CM than in control subjects (1.6 +/- 0.81 vs 0.8 +/- 0.19, P < .001) as a result of shortened D (0.43 +/- 0.13 vs 0.56 +/- 0.06, P < .01) and prolonged S (0.58 +/- 0.12 vs 0.44 +/- 0.06, P < .01). The S/D ratio was highly correlated to heart rate in restrictive CM (r = 0.95, P < .0001). The high S/D ratio found in restrictive CM, found also in dilated CM, suggests that this index is generic to heart failure rather than to a specific disease. The S/D ratio is easily measured using Doppler flow, enhancing echocardiographic assessment of D function in children.

Published 13 November 2006 in J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 19(11): 1326-31.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Ultrasound Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Ultrasound Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)



Ultrasound Books

Ultrasound Physics CD-ROM Mock Exam

Ultrasound Physics CD-ROM Mock Exam